CRITICAL THINKING [25 points]6. Goal - understands the purpose/goal of the lab in the correct context.
7. Procedure - understands the sequential nature of the lab. How does the exercise's procedure lead directly to the final result? Can the result be improved upon (i.e., made more believable)? Given a lot more time, how would you change the procedure? Can the data quality and/or quantity be improved?
8. Assumptions - understands the assumptions, simplifications, and/or systematic errors that support the procedure (i.e., WHY the lab achieves the desired result).
9. Consequences - understands the implications of the conclusions. Work beyond the conclusions: the lab result can suggest consequences, implications, of have a wider applicability, e.g., would a conclusion about our solar systembe true for each individual planet (deduction), or is a conclusion a part of a larger body of physical processes (induction)?
10. Perspective - understands and employs the verification of the results with an independent authority All of the lab exercises have been performed, on a grant scale, by professional scientists. Literature searches will reveal their results. How do your results compare? Does it help to compare your results with other students?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||